The part about winning the suit was meant as sort of a sarcastic joke. Glad you saw the humor. But don't take the easy way out, here. Was your previous post correct in that you only have a jacket? Curious viewers want to know. The truth is, you've never used a complete suit. You base it all on technical data that doesn't even pertain to what is at issue. You're citing technical data concerning the industrial use of carbon. Don, what we're talking about here is clothing that we use for recreation. It does not have to perform to government specs for it to have some usefulness. You can never prove that is does NOT WORK TO SOME DEGREE, which is all those of us who use it can expect. No different than us using scent covers, baking soda, or anything else. Is baking soda a magic fail-safe potion with scientific fact that it works for deer? NO. But we try it and we have positive experiences with it. Same as carbon suits. Now come on and tell us, have you EVER actually tried a complete suit? Let all these young viewers know that you haven't actually tried it but they should take your word over countless others who've bought and continue to buy and use the product. Take the challenge. Go buy a suit and actually try it with an open mind. If it doesn't work then you could give it to your church for a raffle. Yes, the church is a good choice as I'm sure they would agree with you that science is the end-all word to everything.

And much like Carnac the Magnificent, I predict there will be NO direct yes or no to the question of whether a complete suit has been ever owned or used as well as no acceptance of ACTUALLY trying it. I'm slow to bash something until I've actually tried it. I've been surprised both ways.