on an earlier post I mentioned how select cutting of trees provides a monetary gain for the land owner and creates the best of all kinds of habitat.
Why isn't this practice used more by the G.C. foresters over unsightly clear cuts that so often get the tree huggers up in arms.
The lack of any common sense on either side has turned a small problem into what we now call the deer wars.
One side states the we have had to many deer for 40 years ,maybe so. But now we have plans to solve this problem by the near elimination of deer in some areas over a short period of time.
On the other side we have people that refuse to believe that the deer are the problem.Maybe they are .But are they the only problem? Is it poor practices in the past that have removed the very trees we need to produce mast to feed all the states animals.
Discussion is very much needed and an idea that a love for wild things is what this battle is about maybe trying to see the other side should not be as hard asfinding the ever elusive Pa mountain lion.