HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Patches......why not?
View Single Post
Old 01-31-2007 | 05:14 PM
  #7  
Pglasgow
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Patches......why not?

ORIGINAL: nchawkeye



My 54 caliber flintlock has a Ed Rayle barrel, cut rifling, .012 inches deep and a twist of 1-72...Your typical conical rifle will have button rifling .006 deep and a twist of 1-48 or so...A conical would have a hard time filling the deeper rifling of a round ball barrel....
I've often wondered about how well conicals fill the grooves when the rifle is fired. I think they do a pretty good job. Lead is pretty soft and when a rifle fires, the bullet is accelerated on the order of over 1000 g's. Thats alot of force. I would think more than a hammer blow. A hammer blow could do it so I suspect that the charge could also.

In my Sidekick, I got leading at 1550 fps and above with some conicals, for example, the 385 GP. The sidekick has deep grooves and they are cut. I figured that the rifling skinned the bullet as it expanded becauseit was accelerated down the bore so fast.

Of interest, my BPI rifles have shallow grooves and the grooves occupy twice the surface as the rifling does. This increases the shearing surface of the bullet (between each rifling) by 33%. The barrels are designed for the Powerbelt conical so I think it is intended to better grip highly acceleratedbore size conicals. The rifling is definitely cut, not buttoned.

For grins and giggles, I plan totest how patched roundballs shoot out this kind of barrel/rifling design. I haven't an opinion as to what the outcome will be, but will report what doeshappen when I test.
Pglasgow is offline  
Reply