HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - BPI's response to my question
View Single Post
Old 01-25-2007 | 07:31 PM
  #17  
Pglasgow
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,470
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: BPI's response to my question

ORIGINAL: Wolfhound76

ORIGINAL: Pglasgow
But I think it would clarify just how safe each rifle is when max loaded with charge and separated double balled projectiles.
All it would do is show what happens when your careless. I'm not advocating those loads just telling you what the max is. You did ask.
Wolfhound, I know you weren't advocating them and for the record, neither am I. I suspect that all of the max loads are extremely dangerous, in all the rifles,whenimproperly loadedas I described.

Yoeman, if that ramrod had space between it and the bullet, it may have made a difference in the outcome of that mistake. The physics are that the very heavy ramrod is capable of bringing the projectile momentarily to a stop. Which is why I suggested double balling with space between the projectiles (makes the mistake of double balling a much, much bigger mistake). They may, as you said, all survive, but I figure this kind a error stands about the best chance of bursting a barrel.

One other thing I've been considering. As a barrel expands in with elastic deformation, it allows breech gas to spill around (i suspect anyway to some degree) the PRB or all lead projectile. Add a plastic skirt (like a Powerbelt) or use a sabot, and it may allow more pressure to build as the plastic can easily expand with the barrel as the pressure increases.
Pglasgow is offline  
Reply