I disagree. They can take Teds lamb and Treds comments to the highest mountain right now and it will notget bowhunting and hunting banned. If this would work for them then you and I wouldn't be talking on a hunting forum. We would be on a home and garden site discussing flower beds. Once again, paranoia and propaganda driving this type of reasoning into hunters' heads. The NONHUNTING public doesn't care what Ted or Tred do. They care about the MONEY in their wallets and if outlawing hunting means much higher taxes andmuch higher insurance premiums,then theNON HUNTING public says screw you anti hunter. Hunters $$,insurance companies interests, and animal population control all weigh into these decisions. The insurance companies alone are the biggest business in America. What they say goes.A few radical people that don't believe in hunting and animals slaughtered at slaughter houses for human consumption are looked up on by the nonhunting public as freaks. Nonhunters may not hunt, but they want their store bought meat. Outlawing hunting is outlawing store bought meat. It is the killing of animals and the antis hate it all.