HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - QLA removed? Results?
View Single Post
Old 12-24-2006 | 06:37 AM
  #7  
SHills
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Rochester, NY
Default RE: QLA removed? Results?

TXHunter58,
I'm new to this forum but have two Omega's, a Thunderhawk Shadow,and a Hawken. All great shooters! Been shooting powder since 88. Both Omega's shoot fantastic. Better than me. The older 8924 I bought in 2002 isexcellent. Whether it be 100 meter clover leafs or Hornady 67272 @ 2.5" high clovers if I do my job its a great shooter. My newest semi custom Omega lam stock w/ fluted barrel is a great shooter too. I haven't worked up a great load but out of the box 110 grains 777 powder 67272 shoot great. 2" group @ 100 meters w/o real seriousness.
In all honesty what scope rings and bases are you using?
I'm using a leupold 2.5-8X36 w/ DD rings w/ the DD Encore/Omega base.
I shoot better w/ higher power like the Leupold VXII 3-9X40.
The only reason I ask is you might get better groups if your not using aluminum bases etc...
LOL, Hills
SHills is offline  
Reply