ORIGINAL: ShatoDavis
People, people, do as I do ignore brutal. He's not worth your time. What good does it do to argue whether a 250 is or isn't better than a 204. its pointless, and brutal will never admit that he's wrong even when you prove him wrong.
The 204 is a nice piece. The 22-250 is a nice piece. They both splatter Prairie Dogs like crazy. I don't like a 250 in a dog town because it heats up too quickly. The 204 heat rapidly as well but not as rapidly as the 250. I've killed many many coyotes with a 250 and it really is my fav. coyote rifle. I made my longest shot on a ground hog with the 204 at 578 yards. So quit arguing with an idiot.
OBTW the 204 isn't even my favorite 20 cal. I much prefer the 20 VT , or 20 Tactical. Now 17's I like the 17 Mach IV (not Mach II which is rimfire)
1. I could care less which one is "better". With cartridges it's usually splitting hairs. I'm not about to sit here and watch some keyboard cowboy spout off crap that obviously isn't true.
2. Oh well since you made your longest shot with a .204 then it must be "better"? Yeah nice logic there. And you have the nerve to call me an idiot. One thing you guys can't seem to learn is to not strawman every argument and to not resort to personal attacks when you're argument fails. Someone needs some lessons in argumentative logic.