I have to echo the general opinions posted here. I own an AK-47 clone and an M4 clone, and I see strengths and weaknesses in both. The AK is easy to maintain and simply does not fail. I'd probably feel better havingthe 7.62x39 within 200 yards (and in urban terrain), but past that distance, I'd go with the more accurate AR platform, and perhaps some optics. It might take an extra shot or two with the 5.56x45 to make sure a target stays down (3-rd. burst, anyone?), but accuracy is paramount IMHO when it comes to rifles. That's what sets them apart from other small arms.

The AR types are modular and more easily modified,upgraded, and "tricked out", but some companies today, like TAPCO, are selling really good gear and accesories for the com-bloc weapons. You can get adjustable stocks, optics platforms, lights, and othernecessary gear for both platforms.

If, God forbid, some Katrina-like event ever made it necessary for me to arm myself to that degree while going about my daily business, I'd probably grab the AK and giveMrs. Six the M4 since she can handle and fire the lighterAR types better than the alternative. Having said that, though, I'd take an M14/M1A over either of the other two if it came down to life or death. Or even the M1 if I had all my clips loaded up.