silent

Just a few questions:

When you talked to the Drury representative; to legitimize your complaint in a way that would justify Drury investigate, did you provide the rep with any corroborating information, e.g., names and contact information of reliable witnesses, did you offer yourself up as a witness, and/or did you know and direct the person to any credible documentation, such as what CharlieP uncovered?

Or, did you tell the rep only that you knew all things you said to be true and that if the Drury officials looked in the right places, they would probably find information that confirmed what you were saying, at least in part?

Using the exact words that were said by you and by the rep; what did you say and what did the rep say? Did he actually say that Drury Outdoors was not making any plans to (even) investigate the accusations to see if the accusations were true or not true? Not true? How could that be in the equation?

Please explain; "I have personal knowledge of his (Foret's) poaching exploits."

Of the "several occasions" that you reported your Foret to the game wardens, did the department investigate all, some, or none of your complaints? What were the results of any of the investigations based on your complaints?