Sylvan,
You would shoot does to get back to where the herd should be or would be if we hadn't had bad management practices in the past. Once it is back in balance, then your point is correct.
Assuming the ratio is out of whack you wouldn't really need to disproportionatly taget doe to return to a more "natural" state. One of the main reasons deer survive as a species is because they are prolific breeders. They survive even where hunting pressure is heavy because they are realy good at replacing themselves. In only a few years from now, nearly all the deer in the woods will be deer that haven't been born yet so even in areas where it is thought that the buck to doe ratio is in bad shape if we were to sudenly institute a strategy that would insure a random kill, it wouldn't be very long before the
natural statewould be reached.