HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - LAND LEASES BAD FOR HUNTERS?
View Single Post
Old 11-15-2006 | 06:05 PM
  #48  
Germ's Avatar
Germ
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
Default RE: LAND LEASES BAD FOR HUNTERS?

ORIGINAL: SwampTHING

Would never pay $$ for a lease!

My brother and myself own a 196 deer hunting property, we also hunt an adjoining 400 acres section of a 1000 acre propertythat a cattle rancher owns. A year ago therancher calledus and informed us that he had been approached about leasing the 400 acres for $1500 for a week of gun hunting, the only week we hunt the property. He wanted too know what we thought about the situation.

Well we cant stop you from leasing that land if you choose too.... and we wont pay you $1500 for the right too hunt it. But you do graze your cattle on our land and the adjoining 400 acres frommay too august every year,,, and most of that time they are grazing our fields and are not in your cedar swamp..Thenyou hay your ungrazed land for winter feed...

The deal we had,, is weallow you too graze our land throughout the summer and we hunt that 400 acre section every year. If you lease that 400 acre section,,, your going too have too find another area too graze your animals and fence off our section of land.whats 4 months of feed or grazing rights cost for your 80 cows im thinking alot more than $1500? Will he ever lease it? possibly,, but he knows where we stand on the matter!
That really sounds like lease, payment is grazing rights. Sounds like a fair deal to me.
Germ is offline  
Reply