HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - LAND LEASES BAD FOR HUNTERS?
View Single Post
Old 11-15-2006 | 07:36 AM
  #27  
Germ's Avatar
Germ
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,682
Likes: 0
From: Michigan/Ohio
Default RE: LAND LEASES BAD FOR HUNTERS?

It's not a rule nor do you have to live by it especially here in Ohio
Not yet, but with all the press Ohio is getting,it is only going to get worst.

Yes I saved my money and sacrifice a ton last year so I could lease some land in Ohio. I think the trap a lot of folks fall into is the we need at least 100 acres to hunt. The lease I am looking is not to big or expensive. What I pay in the lease helps the owner pay the property taxes. From the owner mouth not mine.

I own land in MI andI have paid to hunt every year.It iscalled property taxes, and they go up every year it seems.

I am sorry a package of venison and a stick of sausage does not cover any cost.

I am not going to apologize for saving my money, and giving up a ton so I can hunt some land. I would love to just goask folks, but the gentleman from Ill is correct. You may loose your hunting ground if it is free now, I think it sucks, but way it is or is going to be in a lot of states.


Germ is offline  
Reply