ORIGINAL: holler critter
Just the the the thing I was talking about. If it were not for these so called trophy and pro wanta be hunters the average hunter would have more chance to hunt and harvest animals and food for their families.
They say that leasing provides a more secure,safe and relaxed hunting enviroment; maybe so,but these rich and privlaged trophy hunters who do not hunt for food or conservation,but for their own pride ,bragging,and endorsement rights or the fact they want all private and public land for themselves is truely unsportsman like. Hunting private land was just as safe and secure beforeso called pro and semi wanta be pros flooded the woods. the only difference now is we have to pay to hunt were we used to hunt free on our neighbors farms. Used to be all you had to do to hunt was talk with and be friendly to to local farmers and land owners.
I tell the truth be told, if this hunting scenero of leasing to hunt continues, hunting as we've known it will not exist. After all the idea in hunting should be to eat what you kill and not to brag to your buddies or for endorsements. How are we going to continue on with the hunting traditions and land and wild life management, If we take the average hunter out of the picture. I'm sure the ones to suffer most will be all of us not to mention the wild life.
Hold on there dude, I am looking for a lease, butI am not a rich man. I am looking to ink a deal in Ohio in Dec. I sacrifice many things to get this lease. You paint a pretty broad stroke with your "Trophy Hunter" comment.
I did not make the rules, I just go with the flo. Looks like leasing is going to stay. Can you blame the land owner/Farmer? They need to eat also