ORIGINAL: HNIJustin
Ah yes, the infamous article with zero shred of reliable scientific evidence. "Well I think this" or "I really know what I'm talking about" and "I heard that" doesn't cut it for me. Want the real scientific evidence behind Scent-Lok? Here you go -
http://www.scentlokscience.com
Have fun Atlasman, that should keep you busy for awhile.
You claim to prefer "real" scientific evidence.........and then post a link to a site that doesn't know how to spell Van der waals forces........and incorrectly uses the term Brownian motion.
Do you really think a "real" scientific source of information would make such elementary mistakes??
Oh, and so far I've killed 3 deer and a coyote this year, and had the opportunity to kill a lot more than that - many of which were directly downwind of me. Imagine that!
Isn't this an example of the "I heard this" or "Think this"......or "I know what I'm talking about" kinda stuff you were just bashing about 2 paragraphs up?
Why is your story about perceived good observations any different then someone else's negative ones? They are either both useful or useless........because they are 2 sides of the same coin.
For anyone who hasn't personally tried it
I have never got the logic behind this statement. Isn't one of the main reasons for education to be able to use your knowledge to make proper decisions and not have to learn everything by trial and error? Don't we teach children not to touch fire or run in the street because it is dangerous??...........Would anyone think it's a good idea to make those kids learn by "trying it". I hope not. I don't need to buy a suit to learn what I have already learned about carbon.......and I didn't learn it from a friend or read it on some goofy site. I learned it from MANY years of post grad work and from working with it firsthand in labsduring multiple published studies.
No one needs to jump from their stands to prove gravity is real.