HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - .280?
Thread: .280?
View Single Post
Old 11-03-2006 | 11:06 AM
  #53  
BrutalAttack's Avatar
BrutalAttack
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: .280?

ORIGINAL: cascadedad

More b.s. If penetration is the only thing, why wouldn't we all use full jacketed bullets? Why do you think bullets are designed to mushroom?
Don't play games with me. A full metal jacket 9mm won't do the same thing that a full metal jacket 5.7 would do. How hard is that to understand?

When did I tell anyone to use FMJ? Why would you want to on an animal?

That was the example that sprang to mind where a smaller bullet moving faster outperformed a larger bullet moving slower.

Research the 5.7 yourself and you won't have to act confused and go off on these tangental arguments.
BrutalAttack is offline  
Reply