Alright, I watched it without any sound...my soundcard is MIA[] Great link, and very interesting but I have some issues with it from the get-go. 1) They're selling the grim reaper. First rule is to always ask if the researchers have a reason to be biased. 2)Do they adress blade sharpness? 3) What about bones? Even the "softer" rib. 4) If they're selling their broadhead...I want to see it tested against more than one other broadhead. Their whole point is that not all mechanicals are created equal..."ours is the best" they claim (Of course I'm assuming this, like I said, I have no sound.) So why do they test it on the principal that all fixed blades are created equal? 5) I couldn't see for sure...when they compare cutting width is the 2-blade perpendicular to the camera lens? 6)That fixed-blade wouldn't be my pick of the "best" for penetration either. And 7)does anyone else think that it looks like the fixed-blade enters the gellatin with a high tail? (Which would MAJORLY rob energy)?

I'm really not trying to start ANOTHER arguement on a horse that has been beaten to death. I just want to point out that there are always wholes in arguements for which you should look.

Yes I am biased towards fixed-blades....for nostalgia if nothing else