HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Pedersoli Co. drops support of Toby Bridges due to his extreme views on Muzzleloading
Old 10-13-2006 | 11:57 AM
  #18  
cayugad's Avatar
cayugad
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,193
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
Default RE: Pedersoli Co. drops support of Toby Bridges due to his extreme views on Muzzleloading

A poster here earlier commented thathefeels the games laws which effecteach state should be determinedby that state. Well..... all 50 Wildlife/DNR governing bodies EXIST TO SERVE IT'S CITIZENS.... so let the American ML hunter decide -- not the other way around!

[hr]


That would be my statement and I justify it in the following..

I attend someDNR meetings where topics of all nature are discussed. At none of the meetings I have attended (which is limited I admit) have I heard a "hue and cry" to allow scopes on muzzleloaders in ourWISCONSIN muzzleloader season. The current laws governing the use of muzzleloaders IMO are more then fair in WISCONSIN. And I really do not think I need to concern myself with other hunters from other states wanting it their way, so they can come and hunt in my STATE. So in effect you could say the citizens of Wisconsin have made their voice heard and Wisconsin's laws reflect their views. Granted out of state hunting revenue is nice for any State and local economy. But let the STATE determine how their wildlife population should be managed, with granted, input from thatState's citizens.

When I make a decision to hunt in a different state, I might very well base my hunting selection on what laws that state currently enforces during their season. But again, that is the choice of that State to decide those laws, and my decision to spend my hunting dollars where I feel I can get the most for my money. If I want to hunt in a place other then my home State, that say for example, does not allow scopes or the use of sabots. Why should I be allowed to insist that I want to hunt with a scope and I want to shoot sabots when that State does not feel the need to do so? That State has based their laws for a reason. If I disagree with their reasons, then I simply spend my money some where else, or hire a professional to increase the odds of a successful hunt.

Further more the idea of separate muzzleloadingseasons in Wisconsin, I am not too sure I would be in favor of. While it would be of little problem for me to participate in them equipment and skill wise, I just do not see the need for it. If you want to use the traditional rifle or the inline, that is your personal choice. Just do not scope them in Wisconsin. The addition of a new season unfortunately then reacts with other current sports and seasons taking place. There is simply a matter of time restraints. Too many things, too little time.

These are my views.
cayugad is offline  
Reply