RE: Question about the WSM calibers?
<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote<font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote> I think it will be a good cartridge, but I also think they used Gore math for the velocities.<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>
You know I like Frizzelr's post. Are you saying Al Gore is not the smartest man in the world...LOL...Actually Robert I wish they had come out with this before the 300 wsm I would have bought it without hesitation. I am betting that it shoots pretty darn close to advertised velocities and no it will not outperform a 270 Weatherby. I too was looking at one in a featherweight and if not for the fact that I own 2 300 wsms It would be in the gun safe right now. I would also like to bring up a side point and that is Winchester/Browning gets criticized for allegedly saying that their rounds are faster or equl to the large magnums and yet the same people ignore the weatherby ad which claims there cartridge hits harder(which is true) but is also twice as accurate. Where in the heck did they get that figure that it is twice as accurate?