ORIGINAL: stubblejumper
You come up with I am shooting a grizzly at 300+yrds with this 220g Bullet,How did you get this from what I wrote?? I stated the power of a 220g piece of lead at a 100yrds....
You brought up shooting grizzly at 350 yards and you brought up the 220gr bullet out of the 30-06 for grizzly hunting.In fact youposted that you would be more comfortable shooting a grizzly at 300 yards than at 100 yards.
My point is that with shot placement any animal can be anchored down and that the 30-06 has more than enough energy and power to bust through both shoulders and exit a grizzly at 350 yrds...
I am goanna be more relaxed when a grizzly is 250 to 300yrds out from me than if he is a 100 yrds or under
..I would feel very comfortable with a 220g bullet fired out of a 30-06 for grizzly
Twisting things around there a bit arent we....To diffrent posts I made and you take bit and pieces from both of them to your defense of accuseing me of something I didn't say.. The right bullet can and I did see it bust through both shoulders and exited a grizzly at 350yrds from a 30-06....
And I would be comfortable shooting at a grizzly at 300+yrds away with a 30-06... If guides won't let you shoot out beyond 150 yrds at griz,Why do you need 300 mags or better to hunt them??? Now we are back in to the what would be the better choice or will they both do just as good at that yardage or closer????Or would the 300 mag do better cause it says magnum??? A gun manufacture that would do a better at these ranges also??? Rem is better for this ranges than browning... I don't think so...So why would a 30-06 beany less usefull at a griz at these closer ranges that the guides want you to shoot at than magnum calibers????? Lets not forget the 06 has way more bullet designs and weights than the magnums does....