ORIGINAL: MichaelT.
Statjunk, I never claimed to be a comedian.
About the evidence, That's my point. If you have evidence, research papers, lab analysis, whatever, bring it forward, and tell people , and approach the people of influence ( with the clothing companies, or if they won't talk - then the media ) and present the evidence you have. But if you don't have it with you then all it boils down to is finger pointing and a does not / does too argument. An argument no one can win, because they cannot present the facts to the people. Believe me, I understand your position. No one wants to be misled or taken advantage of. And Most people don't like seeing others taken advantage of, but what happened tonight accomplished nothing. It was just a no win argument. That's why my earlier post said " get the facts together and tell people". I also said I would listen. But in this Country it is innocent until proven guilty. And a finger pointing argument is not proof. Like I said, I don't own any of it, and I never will, but ultimately each person has to take all of the facts available to him at that time and make his own decision.
What kind of a post is that from a chemist?? We are not talking about subjective material here. The chemical properties of carbon are not up for debate. Evidence has been posted time and time again showing the requirements needed to regenerate carbon. Again, the chemical and physical laws of carbon are not the issue here..........those have been established for MANY years. Claims that are contrary to these known laws are what need to be proved. You have the "innocent until proven guilty" part backwards. Carbon laws are proven(innocent) and any claims against them(guilt) need to be proven........not the other way around.