ORIGINAL: Scent-Lok G.Designer
Thirdly, to the science subject. Even if we do show you our testing it will do no good to many of you as you will say it is dirty science. We paid the labs. We did this or that. So you see we are pretty much in a no win situation.
That is completely rediculous and NO scientist would EVER make such a statement. Research and data are all a scientist has to prove their claims. The data gets peer reviewed and if the proper procedures were followed and there is no obvious bias.........and the scientific method is intact then the data gets published and stands on it's own merit.
In the world of science you can SAY whatever you want........and no one cares.............until you prove it. If you cannot prove it then your statements are useless.
That is the beauty of opening your data to the public........because if you did not practice "dirty science" or pay the labs (bias) then you can sit back and grin while all your detractors would be proven wrong. ANY company that had data in it's posession that proved all it's advertising claims would be posted it in EVERY magazine out there and shouting it from the hilltops.
The flip side of that is exposing data that does not pass the bogus test. Then you open yourself up to fraud claims.
Lastly, I have never seen scientific evidence of scent lures (particularly those of estrus does) and their effectiveness during the prerut and rut stages? Nor scientific evidence that grunting is an effective tool while hunting. Also provide scientific evidence on the effectiveness of mock scrapes. Yet almost every hunter does them and buys those products.
None of those products make claims contrary to proven scientific laws............and many of them get grilled as well. Especially scents.