HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - .22-250 vs. .220 Swift
View Single Post
Old 09-19-2006 | 08:23 PM
  #33  
BrutalAttack's Avatar
BrutalAttack
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: .22-250 vs. .220 Swift

ORIGINAL: DANTHEHUNTER

My friend I will not argue with you over what you think is the best. All I am saying is if you are going to talk about this you have to be open minded.
Have you actually read the thread?

ORIGINAL: BrutalAttack
I am all for going with a .220 if someone can prove to me that there is enough performance difference in the factory offerings to justify getting it in place of a .22-250.
Isn't that being openminded?

ORIGINAL: DANTHEHUNTER

The .220 swift is the varmit rifle most compared to, That tells me it is the one to have .
Just because everyone else thinks it's the best doesn't mean it's the truth.

ORIGINAL: DANTHEHUNTERIts like having the original ,You just keep saying its only this or only that what does that tell you ? That is a sure sign that you are unsure. I am not saying the .22-250 is'nt a great round ,cause it is, I just dont like it as well as my swift.
Of course I'm unsure. If I was sure I wouldn't be asking a bunch of blow-hards on a internet forum would I? lol

ORIGINAL: DANTHEHUNTER
On the subject of reloading and factory loads. I totally understand what you are saying about stated factory loads. They have a margin of error built in to there rounds. So what I am telling you, I can and have loaded the swift and the 250. They both load well, I can just get more out of the swift in all grain bullets there is just more case capacity with the swift. I am in no way saying that the 250 isnt good it's just right behind the swift.
Again: you're not understanding. I don't reload so the fact that you can get more out of the Swift means nothing to me. Only the factory loads do.
BrutalAttack is offline  
Reply