What you've failed to recognize is that a lot if not most USP members don't really care what you think. They know what the conditions are where they hunt and want a change in the management form. That's not being unreasonable given the hunting conditions on a great many game lands as well as State property.

Your looking out for your particular wants and needs and so are the people who signed the law suit. (Remember the large percentage of license sales loss? The silent minority...)
It's imperative for RSB to go along with the PGC deer plan. He works for them. Also, if/when DCNR takes over , and they have great influence over the agency as we all know, Dick may get a layoff slip. The Game Commission and the Fish Commission certainly wouldn't need that many officers. That being the case they could fill up any available openings and the rest would be either put out to pasture or simply laid off as is the case in the real world.
Remember, both agencies have legislative laison reps. Both agencies have executive staffs. Both agencies have officers.All that duplication would be surperfluous and undoubtly some folks would get the boot. So..., in order to maintain this duplicity the PGC has to fight hard to stay alive even though all the legislators have been made aware of the incompentance the PGC has displayed (for all to see) in running an agency and driving it intio near bankruptcy as well as standing by while their customer base dwindles away and they continue to alienate the hunter.

Maybe the PGC should hire Gary Alt back. I'm sure he has a plan.