ORIGINAL: vc1111
Manuman, I posted a long, line by line response to your last. Instead, I'll get to the point. It is clear to anyone that reads this thread, that you are hinting that you should be the one to forward a petition on this matter...because of your "tact" and people skills."
When anyone suggests otherwise, you insult..that's why you felt compelled to apologize for your nasty remarks about PETA and arson...after it was brought to your attention on it by myself and another board member.
I see a contrast there, a contradiction. Perhaps you do not.
Whatever. You go ahead on with your hopes of becoming a diplomat for all hunters.
I think it's a time for direct and stern communications...not shouting or screaming as you are wont to suggest in your insulting ways. You think it's time to more or less negotiate. Both of our suggestions are nothing more than opinion...so please stop posturing as though every word you utter is fact. The fact is that you do not know the man; you do not know what will and what will not sway him. All that you say is conjecture, your opinion, nothing more.
You may now resume your campaign to be drafted as whatever you hope you can be in this instance.
THis has gone from ridiculous to absurd.Yes, youreplied line by line, nbut your responses showed you don't have a clue as to what I actually said.You are completely wrong about my secondary remarks about PETA, etc. They were sarcasm completely, not directed at anyone in particular, and someone took it persnal so I made a clarification. Talk about inconsistent. One minute I work with him every day,and now I don't know the man. And no, I am speaking directly from my convos, and emails with the man--nothing more , nothing less-never claimed anything that you keep trying to attribute to me. I have made a suggestion, out of a spirit of cooperation with others that have concerns, to present their ideas directly to DF when I meet with him face to face. You sound like no matter what, you are just aiming to be contentious toward anyone, and anything. I have not resorted to insults, so you can toss out that one while you are at it,as well. As for your silly remarks about being 'drafted',(whatever that means),I simplyinitiated contactwith him by email, and then by phone after he requested--just like many others have. I made an offer to present well documented, well founded, real complaints ,with names, to demonstrate the volume of opposition that he is receiving from this particular forum, and for whatever reason, of which I have several theories, (but I will refrain from jumping to conclusions)you have a problem , based on paranoidal, unfounded, and totally off the mark conclusions. You have been wrong about my motives,my methods,and my actions. I am not posturing about anything. I got involved out of concern about the ramifications of how this would affect the future of something important to me, and all you can do is to continue with your amateur psychology, attempting to speak as if you have a clue about me and my position, You haven't even been close in your asessment . Why don't you spend some time doing something about this problem, rather than spending your time attempting to figure me out--and doing a very poor job of it at that.
I don't have time to continue to restate my case to someone not interested in anything more than bickering about his misperceptions, and who's reading between the line skills are in desperate need of correcting.