Well, since you haven't been privvy to any conersations I've had with DF, you really don't know what I am talking about.
I do know that you're suggesting that anyone that disagrees with your approach is probably of the same mentality as PETA, even suggesting that others would be inclined to engage in vandalism and arson. Why would I think for a moment that you would be one that would be somehow solely qualified or even level-headed in a conversation with him or anyone else? The fact is that
you've displayed a propensity for hyperbole.
Do you really expect him to concede because he has received some well intentioned, yet ill advised rhetorical protests? I can ssure you that he won't.
manuman, how can you presume to say the stuff you've said in your last 2 or 3 posts? How can you assure me of anything as to the actions of a third party? Because you've conversed with him for a few minutes? Lol, is he your brother or what?
The only language that he will understand is firm, statistically accurate, well thought out and well delivered facts.
You work with this guy every day or what? What exactly is your relationship to him that you could possibly expect to have any credibility in making such bold statements? How do you know what he'll react to and what he won't? How can you presume that anything direct that someone might say to him by way of letter or conversation would by default be nothing more than "ill-advised rhetoric?" You apparently have a high-minded vision of yourself and a low opinion of others and I'm still trying to figure out why.
If he can't be convinced through these means, then he won't ever be.
Lol, and you know these things after having simply spoken to him? That's some amazing stuff.
I've got
no use for anyone who would regularly drug wild animals for fun and profit. Apparently you've fallen for whatever he whispered to you during your supposedly insightful and intimate conversation. You may be star-struck by this character, but I am not. You attack, in a left-handed back-handed fashion, anyone that would purport to confront him in any way, painting
him as logical and level-headed and his detractors as probable vandals and arsonists.
What is wrong with this picture, boys and girls?
Your obvious and intentional exaggeration is inconsonant with your claims of wisdom, experience, and knowledge in this matter. We're talking about a guy that is/was seriously suggesting shooting whitetails with darts full of dope while the cameras roll, for the bemusemant of the masses he supposedly hoped to salute and enrich with such "entertainment."
Once in a great while someone comes up with an idea so wildly stupid that he or she should have said stupid idea be redressed in plain Englsih. This is one of those times.