HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - A hunter's stance on the WHA
View Single Post
Old 08-28-2006 | 02:27 PM
  #31  
NEW61375's Avatar
NEW61375
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,119
Likes: 0
From: Southeast, VA
Default RE: A hunter's stance on the WHA

Still missing my point. I know you don't care what I think. I don't care if you bait/feed. First everyone hated the darting, then that went away, now a lot of people were commenting on the fences and I thought that was a little funny since fenced ranches and hunting are all over the place. So I pointed that out, it just so happened that the link I used to point that out had a lot of info on their baiting practices(they state that each hunter will be assigned a feeder and a tripod)and I did insert my opinion on that ranch (not baiting in general) and I did depict their methods/practices in my post, to quote myself:

"You can find outfittersfrom links hereat Hunting.Netthat advertise fenced hunting grounds with feed trucks and feeders, and if it's legalso be itbut thats not what I consider bowhunting."

The guys I know with feedersdon't hunt on top of their sites they simply use them to provide supplemental feeding with premium feed andmineral supplements during the off season and throughout the winter.
I like you was not trying to be confrontational, about baiting anyway,just pointing out a double standard in regards to the fencing. My main thought is like most, I am opposed to what the WHA came out with and stands for(the further commercialization of hunting) but are they going away?If theyare not, can their format be changed even more so the end productis less offensive to the hunting communityandothers as well.
NEW61375 is offline  
Reply