HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - A question for R.S.B.
View Single Post
Old 08-21-2006 | 10:27 PM
  #99  
Mocha Java
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: A question for R.S.B.

It seems like you are just whining that you need this to get your job done. I wouldn't worry so much -- ordinary LEO's manage to fill the jails without resorting to police-state tactics.

ORIGINAL: R.S.B.
Do you really and seriously think it would be a benefit to the honest hunters and the resources of the state if WCOS didn’t check hunters unless we had already seen them commit a violation?


Actually, with opinions like these, I think you need retraining in the rights of persons. It benefits all of us when when government officials obey the constitution -- a concept that you seem to have trouble with.

I would rather suspect that if we had an opportunity to check the criminal history on some of the radicals posting on here we would soon learn why they are so anti-enforcement. I suspect that is also the biggest reason they desire to stay anonymous.

Dick Bodenhorn
WCO, Elk County




Here is a perfect example of desperation: call a name, make a slur!

Anonymity here protects you, because if you knewposters' names and publishedthem in the context ofwhat appears to be a libelous statement implyingcriminal records, you'd be paying for the next twenty years!

As it is, you are not the keeper of "Truth". I would characterize you more as one enamored of half-truths. You stated that the courts constantly upheld these laws but ignored that 34 Pa. C.S. 904 (must ID yourself) was thrown out as "unconstitutional on its face under the4th Amendment."

http://www.courts.state.pa.us/opposting/cwealth/out/65cd01_5-24-02.pdf

Mocha Java is offline  
Reply