We absolutely agree on this point. Again, if it were merely a competition revolving around hunting, I could care less. Then, it would have to stand on its own merit as to whether the public -- namely the hunting community, because that would be its target audience -- would accept it as a viable product.

As I said earlier, it's the fact that this other fiasco is attempting to "represent" hunting and to be our "savior" is where my concerns lie.

Again, I repeat what is quicklybecoming mydefinitive thoughtfor this discussion: "One portrays itself as hunting, when it's not. The other is merely a competition revolving around hunting. Therein lies the difference."

I can't make it any plainer than that.