If you're not implying that they're (WalMart)forcing Muzzy to toe this line.....then it sure appears to me that you are. And....if this is true....WHY BLAME WALMART? Why not hold MUZZY accountable for selling inferior products to ANYONE? If you aren't implying that.....then what's your point????? You put that article and that question together in the same thread.....there's an implied inference.
Am I wrong? I'll apologize.
I asked the question and
then did some research in an effor to find out the answer. Again....show me where I balme WM. The only thing that I implied was that WM wanted Snapper to produce a lower quality line of mowers to sell so why would it be so hard to believe that the muzzies I bought were of lesser quality.
Just like "Snapper" in the atricle....Muzzy could say no. If they are producing an inferior product I do have a problem with it from both WM and Muzzy. WM for squeezing the provider and the provider for agreeing.
MY point for the post was to find out if anyone else had experienced the same thing or if anyone knew if these practices were taking place.
Sorrythat I upset you so much..........
