<BLOCKQUOTE id=quote<font size=1 face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' id=quote>quote:<hr height=1 noshade id=quote>
Okay Matt, now you've gone and done it! Like I need some other high-priced toy to occupy my every passing thought! Thanks, BUDDY!! (said with as much venom as I can muster! <img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>)
Okay, the specs do sound incredible, and enough to get me to give up a left n... never mind. But, I guess my question still remains a little bit: Are you guys saying it takes going to the twin cams to produce these kind of numbers, and they can't do it with single-cam technology? (Nothing wrong with that, just curious as to why the companies are going back to the twins.) Is it to eke out the extra KE, fps, and all the other goodies?
Discipline -- not desire -- determines destiny.
<hr height=1 noshade id=quote></BLOCKQUOTE id=quote></font id=quote><font face='Verdana, Arial, Helvetica' size=2 id=quote>
FWIW, Companies aren't really "going back to twins" they've been making them all along (with the exception of Mathews).
Heck some companies i.e. Hoyt aren't offering a single or dual cam as an option. It's either a cam and 1/2 or a Spiral cam and 1/2 that's it.
BowTech has refined their both their duals and their singles this year...
FWIW, There are some single cams designs lurking in the darkness that are faster than the new dual cams... I don't think we'll see them for a while though...<img src=icon_smile_wink.gif border=0 align=middle><img src=icon_smile_big.gif border=0 align=middle>