Oh my Sproulman.The PGC does not want all the deer dead.Without the deer,the PGC would be in trouble.The insurance industry has nothing to do with herd reductions.If you want to debate that one,have at it.Where does DCNR and the timber companies stand?Well,out of anyone,they definately want less deer.I really don't like their stance on everything and I certainly don't like the Rendell yes men that are running the show.So do they want all the deer deadso they they can ban hunting and take our guns?That's ludicrous.There will always bedeer and hunters will always be needed.DCNR only has say on what happens on state forest land.They don't control the forests or game on the remaining areas of the state,which is the majority of land.The state forests are managed for timber and that's not going to change.Deer are a part of the state forests but deer hunting is not the primary function of that property.I don't understand why most people fail to realize this.

I do agree with you guys about the expansion of the elk herd into the habitat depleted areas of 2G.Simply insane.

If the PGC wants all the deer dead and they want our guns,why did they drastically reduce the antlerless alloction in 2G over the past two years?

I can see wanting to keep a close eye on anything Rendell is overseeing.I can also see questioning the motives of DCNR to a certain degree.I just can't belive so many people buy into they crazy conspiracy theories about stocking predators and taking away our guns.