Well then Sproulman (or is it James himself), since these other guys haven't been able to find answers to these questions maybe you can?? Or at least next you go to his place for cocktails you could ask him. I'm sure he is a nice guy when not in caracter, he just has trouble when the truth and the facts are different from his opinions.

The topic at hand is why does the author state something should be a certain way, but then complains against it when it is that way?
* Why does he say he'd be the pgc gets a bad rap and its a much tougher job than most would think because they don't understand? But you can almost count on his articles bad mouthing either hunters or the pgc. He's the one giving out the bad rap and fostering this division.
* Why did he say hunters who don't want to pay for more game lands are selfish and greedy, but then turn around and support that same crowd who just recently said that again at a recent meeting in Dubois?
* Why does he say the wmu's should be based on terrain, habitat cover, and human density; then when they are he complains about it?
Why does he explain that there's always hot and cold spots and there's no way around, but then complain about it when there becomes more cold spots?
* Why does he want to go back to those traditional seasons that he says creates those hot and cold spots?
* Why does he say those uninformed hunters always give the solution of closing the doe season, and now he claims the solution IS to close the doe season?
* And why does he claim to not be a member of the usp when he mentions them at every chance he gets and speaks at all their meetings. Any normal person who believes in an organization (I use that term loosely) would become a member and proudly claim to be.

As far as the sueing goes (seems to be his answer to everything) you should remove your blinders. He makes a living degrading individual members of the pgc, the dcnr, various members of the conservation cummunity, sporting clubs, hunters, and his favorite- Dr. Alt. Anyone who doesn't agree is automaticaly on the governers secret payroll.

He had come on that site years ago, clashed with many of the hunters there, had his wife(covered his liability) come on and threaten people, then threatened the owner of the site to not allow any of his writings to be used on the site. Makes one wonder why, if he truely believes in what he says, why he wouldn't want that message diseminated?? But instead will only have meetings of his followers which tend to have a very small attendance of 50-75 people. Then claims a majority of hunters support his position.
As far as this site goes, the only degrading came from his supporters. Please read back through this thread and you'll see just how many names I've been called. Don't worry none though, I didn't cry to the owner or tell the wifey! I've only tried to keep it civil and on topic. Shall I have Webster provide you the definition of "Class"?
Have a nice weekend.