Mocha I never said that was an actual transcript, please try to follow along. I said they were
some quotes from his interview, that I had found posted on another site.
Your copy of your alledged letter is
not signed. However, I'll take your word for it till I find out otherwise. BUT, anyone can type up something and post it on the internet and claim it as authentic. Would you like me to show you?
From: "Carter, Linda" <
[email protected]>
To: <***@msn.com>
Subject: American Hunter
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2006 11:00:19 -0400
Dear Mr. ***:
Thank you for giving us the benefit of your insights regarding the issues surrounding deer herd management in Pennsylvania. This issue is clearly complex, highly divisive, and above all, a state matter best resolved by knowledgeable, concerned parties within Pennsylvania. However your club has proven to not be one of those parties, based on it's history.
The National Rifle Association has no position on the techniques advocated by the organization known as "Quality Deer Management." However, we have a strong position in regard to the pending lawsuit that has been filed by Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania (USP) against the Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) and others. This lawsuit will set a precedence for other anti hunter groups to hinder time and valuable resources that could be put to much better use, rather than trying to appease every special interest group that comes along. It will add another tool in their box to help end hunting and eventually gun ownership.
Sincerely,
Scotty Olmstead
Editor-in-Chief
American Hunter
See how easy that is to do?
Now can you fake a recording of an interview done 8 years ago? I don't think so. It's recorded history. I'm sorry, but I couldn't post the recording even if I did have it. (Are you new to the internet?) So I gave you two sources, actually 1 and crazyone gave you the other, to get this recording from and hear it for yourself. Or for a third source you could contact "shooter" himself for it.
Now let me help you out with the numbers. The interview was about 8 years ago. Jimmy changed his views 180 degrees
at least 5 years ago, 8-5=3. Three years makes it 2001 not 2006. The reduction didn't really start till 2001 and they raised the antler restriction in 2002.
Hence my questions that you or anyone have failed to answer. Now who's doing the dodging????
Here's a hint crazyhorse. Newspaper opinions or column do not constitute facts, especially from such a source with very low credability in the outdoor community.
Now if you can't be civil, stay on topic and answer, or even opin on the questions posed on
why the sudden flip flop, please do not post a reply. These are legitimate questions that hunters want to know. I understand it is your goal to have this somewhat incrimidating evidence removed from public view, so I will not further foster your attempts. You've degraded the other site from your style of "debate" and I don't think this site wants that to happen here.
Have a nice day!