ORIGINAL: Airborneguy
"Once you said it was your opinion, that changed things, but then again you said that AFTER the original post. "
And I did, and that should have been the end of this. You're calling me foolish? Re-read the timeline of this conversation. At any moment you can stop talking to me, I actually welcome that. I'll even let you have the last word since that seems to be the problem, so fire away.
I believe that the problem is that I failed to take your bait and get hysterical when you attacked me and my forum, and that is bothering you.
I'm amazed. Simply amazed. I bow to your wisdom. I'll end this discussion on my part as well. While I said you forum was lowly, and non-attended, notice a sentence later that I acknowledged what you and your forum was doing is a good thing. Every forum is lowly and non-attended when it first starts out. Was it a bait? No. It was advice.
The timeline shows I've attempted to stay on topic of the thread. You have directed conversation at me not related to this thread, just as I did with your forum. Seems you like to call the kettle black, Mr. Pot. For the record, I never called you foolish, that's in your head.
Again, back on topic (for the final time hopefully). TO THE THREAD STARTER! (notice that's not you airborne, okay? I don't want you to get confused and say I accused you of starting a thread!)
Another question I have on the forestry issue is the inspection of the tree health issues. Who maintains records on the outbreaks (like the blight)? The general health of the forest could be revealed in a manner that the DEC or park service would be inclined to act.