No I'm not suddenly "sucking-up" to Randy. But until/if he arrives here to defend himself -- Toby included, then I will defend the folks who are paid to make sure that safety/testing measures should not be confused with your range/hunting experiences.



Those twosentences of mine only means Randy was thereto provide information on his prior testings - not necessarily for money in this instance. This is all about guntesting that's done nowhere near your hunting woods or gun range. What Toby & Randy do as advisors and/or techsfor gun companies gives you no right to duplicate those loads with your rifle. That frame of mind could lead to abarrel burst -playing around with loads not recommended by the manufacturer or powder company.

Good grief man! Nowhere doeseither sentence state that Randy was paid by Savage to testany rifle. All it says was he was there to provide them with answers. Soin the meantime, I will defend his right to do so - because he tests MLs.Randy's own gun testings of various weaponsdoes not give you the right to assume he's been paid by all who seek him for information -also doesn'tgive you the rightto include any brand you want - orsay otherwise atany posting times like this thread here.

I gave you ageneralized statementof some work Randy does/done. I never said what brands are included in his gun tests & that he was paid for firing a Savage rifle in tests. Yes... I'm sure someone has paid Randy in the past for testing info. But where did I say "Savage'?????

What else are you going to twist around in this thread?

Remember what I said about black & white? Well... you ain't listening!!!