HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - .300 WM Or .300WSM
View Single Post
Old 03-05-2006 | 06:01 PM
  #7  
Duckbutter48's Avatar
Duckbutter48
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley Springs, WV
Default RE: .300 WM Or .300WSM

I think if the 300Win was so great and didnt need an improvement, then the 300WSm wouldnt be one of the most popular calibers out now, which is amazing since there were already so many 30 cal magnum and non magnum choices before it was introduced.(no I dont have either, I have the 300wby) For the most part I think shorter action=better action.

As far as saying make the rifle heavier and I'll take a few less pounds on my gut, well thats just foolish. Id take the lighter rifle any day of the week. The light weight rifles usually cost more then the standard weights so obviously lighter is better. THats like saying oh give me those 4lbs each boots, instead of the lighterones that are just as warm.Alot of binos and scopes are judged not just by the glass but by the wieght. If you want a workout then put some wrist weights on. No matter what you gut looks like you still have to carry that extra wieght around thats why we dont see everyone with a 28" heavy contour barrel(or somethingridiculously heavey like that)walking threw the woods.
Duckbutter48 is offline  
Reply