ORIGINAL: Lanse couche couche
DD,
I'm not going to throw any brickbats. I understand perfectly the logic behind wanting to protect one's investment. I just have trouble getting past the whole idea of ownership of stuff that is supposed to be game. I mean the whole point of something being wild game is the fact that it does stufflike wandering off a large ranch onto the adjacent 50 acre tract, then, perhaps over on to some public land. I would think that if folks don'twant that to happen, perhaps theyneed toput more effort into making their land ideal habitat rather than worrying aboutfences.
LCC I agree with you in that I think "wild" game belongs to everyone..although I do remember seeing cowboys capturing wild Mustangs and pinningthem in .... however my point it that I can understand a man who wants to high fence HIS property ...not thatI would even if I could afford to ...I personally do not think its ethical but I understand the mindset ofan owner who doesis my only point.
dd