I fully realize the Phil Inq in all likelyhood added,deleted,edited info that might have made the study appear more pallable to a seasoned/hunter.The fact remains that 50 some deer were tagged and the report indicates only a handful of deer were taken.Hello - Wheres the Beef! It certainly appears a criticism to the hunters.

I would like to read details of study - It does sound interesting.

BUT - just because a study was conducted by Penn State or any other insitutution of learning does not imply without impunity the methods used or data gathered are an absolute indicater of hunter sucess or failure.