Ya see this is where you guys just don't get it! The DEC doesn't have to prove they DIDN'T release any coyotes. They are the ones ACCUSED ofthe deedand it is the ACUSER'S repsonsibility to prove the acusation not the ACCUSED's responsibility to prove they are incocent of the accusation. What country were you guys brought up in? You are actually arguing that it is logical tohear some story and unless the story can be proved false then it most be true. That's absolutely illogical not to mention ridiculous! You see this is a major reason you are being laughed at! Anybody with common sense simply chuckles at your reasoning.