I don't know how you came up with that BS youjust said. How is there any logical comparison between what you just said? What you just said contradicted itself. I feel people are responsibleenough to make the decision whether or not to wear BOup in a tree then you go on sayingI thinkpeople are irresponsible and need their nanny to tell them whatto do. What is going on inside that head of yours?!!!!

If I remember correctly, BO is supposed to keep people from being shot. Also the last time I checked, deer can't climb trees. If someone shoots into a tree thinking it was a deer, they should go live in a mental institution because that person must have some serious mental issues shooting up into a tree thinking it was a deer.

If I hunted state land, I would wear BO in a tree because you don't know who will be there. But if I am on private property why should I have to wear BO if I felt safe enough not wearing it ina tree. I think it should be left up to the hunter.

Like I said, I feel that people are responsible enough to make a decision. I am sorry if you got the wrong impression, but what I was saying is if a BO bill was going to get passed one way or another I would rather it be one where if you were a certain distance above the ground you would not be required to wear it.