quote:

So if you or anybody else makes the argument thatthey are lying and they did realeasethem, unless you have some proofthen you are just another conspriracy buff propagating another conspriacy theory.

Quite true. Unfortunately for you, it isn't my duty to prove that your coyote conspiracy is a falsehood. It is the duty of the person making the charges to prove them true. To do so, you must supply the officer's name, rank, and a method of contacting him to verify that what you say he said is actually what he said. Note, I am not calling the officer a liar. If there is one, finding out what he actually said will disclose that person. So far, nothing but an unsubstantiated rumor has been put forward. It has no date, time, place, names, or anything factual attached to it. Do this and I might start to give you conspiracy buffs some credence. Until then, you are just another conspriracy buff propagating another conspriacy theory. Sorry, but that is my opinion and I'm sticking to it.