HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Marlin 45/70 or Puma .454?
View Single Post
Old 12-15-2005 | 11:14 AM
  #2  
eldeguello's Avatar
eldeguello
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,270
Likes: 0
From: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Default RE: Marlin 45/70 or Puma .454?

ORIGINAL: VT_Hunter1980

I'm trying to make up my mind. I got a Christmas bonus and I'll be selling a gun I don't care for, which translates to new gun time.

I'm torn between a Marlin 1895 in 45/70 and the Puma 1892 in .454. I know the Marlin has more power potential and versatility, but the Puma would be less expensive to load for (it fires .45 colts as well) and has a certain uniquness about it.

Ah, life's decisions.
And the Puma is a lot handier and lighter than the Marlin. In addition, it is that great, Model 92 Winchester action. I really would like a Puma .454. Granted, it is not as powerful a round as the .45/70. But it is plenty for North American game. Loaded with the right bullets, you could even take on the big bears with it.
eldeguello is offline  
Reply