First off let me start out by saying that I will be away from my computer until 12-23-05, so I can not reply until then.

Please read my entire post before you reply.

I have come toa turningpoint in my hunting life. I do not like the idea of supplemental food plots.
IMHO Pope & Young & Boone & Crocket, should not allow any animals in there books that has been shoot over a supplemental food plot.
My point:If you plant something that increases antler growth it is not a trophy. If we banned the use of the "enhanced antler growth" food plots? This would put everyone on the same playing field.This would have the same effect asbanning steroids in pro sports.

I am not against food plots. The only food plots I do not like, are the ones that contain supplementsto enhance antler growth.
If a person hunts overfarm/crop land, I see nothing wrong with it.

I just do not think growing a trophy with steroids, vitamins or supplements is fair.