Every time a law is passed that restricts or prohibits a right of the hunting individual it is a major victory for the anti's. They will nibble and take anything, knowing that over time they stand a good chance of winning.
RMO one thing I disagree with is your seat belt example. It isa fact that they prevent serious injuries and death in the case of an accident. Long term recovery and hospital stays are paid for by all the drivers that pay for insurance. What one person actually pays for insurance each can be a small percentage of a hospital bill. The less serious injuries to pay the less that your insurance payments should be.