That's funny. Re-read your first post to thesource in this thread, and your random statement about politics. Seems like you have a history of doing what you claim to be the problem. At least that is what I can see from recent postings. That's a completely objective view, not an "issue" as you like to call them.

As far as your "position," it is clearly a devil's advocate role here. The thread is about whether AR should be for NY. You glue yourself to that "relevant" point, and nothing else. I honestly inquire as to your thought on AR in NY, as the thread states? Or do you wish to continue this off-topic banter? I prefer the former.

And I really like your misquote of me. Try to not infer statements out of my words that aren't there. I said that info is relevant AFTER the social question is answered. Until then, it's only numbers on paper. MEANING, it is NOT relevant until after the social question is answered. Understand the difference? It cannot be "always has been relevant" until after the laws/regulations have been addressed on what a trophy is. I don't see why you can't understand that. Like I said, until you, the state, and the rest of our sportsmen and women decide on what a trophy is, then and only then will those numbers become relevant bio data. Before that, its as worthless as used toilet paper, and not relevant.