Steve has it nailed. I'm just strongly against AR mandated state-wide.

I relate it to a company who pollutes a river. What prevents that company from polluting? Is it biological consequences? Partly. But first and foremost it'sthe laws that prevents/controls it.

From an AR perspective, we need to answer the important social question of who can shoot what (law/regulation). Then, and only then, can we argue biology. It's pointless to do otherwise beforehand on an official capacity.