HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.
View Single Post
Old 11-12-2005, 02:26 PM
  #33  
mossy33oak
Nontypical Buck
 
mossy33oak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 4,572
Default RE: 300.wsm vs. 300 rem ultra mag.

ORIGINAL: stubblejumper

I think we need to look atthe different types ofhandloaders to better understand what is being said here.There are those of us that spend a great deal of time developing loads and testing different component combinations and seating depthsuntil we discover which load will provide the best combination of accuracy,velocity and bullet performance on game.These are the people that really understand the concept of load development.Then there are those people thatsimply choose aspecificload printed in a manual and load it up and hunt with it.They assume that just because it is a handload,it must offer superior accuracy and performance and if it doesn't they condemn handloading as a wasted effort.These people may consider themselves handloaders,but they really have no comprehension of load development and their efforts often produce results that offer no advantages over factory loads.
you forgot one stubble..........the guy who reloads to slightly improve accuracy but save money. I got into reloading because when I bought my 300 RUM I didnt want to pay $35-$40 a box. Now I reload for all of my rifles and I have all of them grouping between .75 and 1.25 and am saving money. I dont redevelope loads or even improve them. If I consistently shoot 1.1 out of my 06 then I stay with it.
mossy33oak is offline