Lets see, how many bowhunters out there would support "bow only"
Probably quite a few. Duh.
Oh and I see that you think we should all drive hybrid cars too.
We should. Duh.
What we hunt with is none of your business!
Au Contraire! 'Tis my business. Anything that affects me, no matter how tangentially, becomes my concern.I had a close friend shot and nearly killed by a junior hunter who didn't know how to operatethe double-safety on his 30-30. If I don't feel safe because you're putting your infant out there with an high-powered rifle, it is my business.
"I'd support bow only." That hurts your ears, doesn't it? Sometimes, you NRA guys are too much. Anyway . . .
I'm a big boy, and I'm quite amused by your personal attacks, and your shots at my political ideology. That said, I refuse to respond any further to keep thisthread from deteriorating into a mudslinging match. If you'd like toattack my views further, feel free to shoot me a PM.Otherwise, we can agree to disagree.
In closing - and you said it yourself:
there are lots of "adults" in the woods that should never be near any weapon
So, logically, by easing the restrictions, and putting more hunters behind the trigger, isn't that creating a more dangerous environment? Further, bygiving them more firepower, aren't we adding fuel to the fire? That's my point. Plain and simple.