Atlasman,

1. We showed you that results on that graph because that is what the test shows. Plain and simple. We only omitted information that is confidential.

2. I told you how the test was done and what equipment does it.

3. They are your lone opinions. You were the only one on fifteen different chat boards to bring in the article about dogs and boxes. That is attributed only to you. And If I recall correctly you said in the post that you linked it to that you searched for it. And again, that dog and boxes is not a very valid study by any means! And again, for too many times now, that graph is what the raw data shows.

4. Great atlasman you made your opinion available for weeks now. Thanks for your lone opinion.

5. Because you want to see testing data not funded be us. So I provided the tools and methods to do it. Again, if you want to fund it and try it at home, go for it. Nothing snide here.

6. Yup, but as above you can read about the techniques and understand fully how we do test.

7. Because the dog is not a studay of merit and you hold a lot of weight in it; and it means nothing.

8. Fine, then don't believe and go away. Again the charts and grphs are the factual data tha tonly omits confidential information. And agin take my wor for it.

9. I think I covered this many times.

Your second post of the night:

1. After twenty washings the bonding agent begins to break down due to the washing process.

Your third post of the night:

1. What other philosophy is there. Continue on and on forever and yeild nothing?

2. Huh? Uh... yes. You better believe in the strength of yur stand, and the speed of your bow and the waterproofness of your boots. I believe the airbag works in my car even though I have never seen it. I believe that the airplane slide will work when I open up the emerengcy door. I guess I really don't understand what you are implying here.

Your fourth post of the night:

1. Did I hear someone say snide remark?

Your fifth post of the night:

1. Uh...I think I already addressed this.

2. Yet your dog and box "study" is valid. Hmmmm, sounds like you just totally discredited your own "study".

3. And if you put regenerated activated carbon between your nose and a mint and can't smell the mint, it just is. Try it at home!

4. No atlasman you are indeed bashing. Like you fourth post, that wasn't bashing? Hmmmmm

5. Again, look at the graph. Ha ha!! Just poking fun. I don't think you will ever agree.