ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
Thia lawsuit is not likely to help anyone except the lawyers. All USP is going to prove is that all has not gone perfectly (as was predicted)
Perhaps USP has now evolved into:
Undercover Supporters of Peta !!!
Whether you realize it or not ,it is the PGC ,not the USP that has provided all the ammunition any anti-hunting group needs to file a suit against the PGC. By claming that durng the last five years with record antlerless harvests, extented seasons and record harvests ,hunters have been ineffective at reducing the herd ,they have support the anti-hunters claim that hunters are not able to control the population.. They also implemented AR's in SRA areas which plays into the trophy hunter claims of the anti -hunters. Also, they conducted the hunter movement survey which implied hunters were lazy and inept and didn't hunt far from the parking lots. The study also claimed that the deer and the habitat were controling the deer population in the big woods, not the hunters.
All those factors support the claims of the anti-hunters and the documentation was provded by the PGC ,not the USP.